Close

SF Bay Area Employment Attorney Blog

Updated:

Labor Commissioner awards more than $2.5 million to seven caregivers

On January 5 ,2018, the Labor Commissioner served Orders, Decisions or Awards in claims of overtime, liquidated damages and penalties by seven caregivers against two limited liability companies and an individual, who was the manager of the LLCs.  After a two-day hearing, the Labor Commissioner awarded over $2.5M to the…

Updated:

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals AFFIRMS D.C. arbitration decision on Capili v. The Finish Line, Inc.

On July 3, 2017, the Court of Appeals issued its opinion AFFIRMING the District Court’s order denying The Finish Line, Inc.’s motion to compel arbitration.  The text of the opinion is as follows:   MEMORANDUM (This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by…

Updated:

The California Supreme Court says: STATE LAW PROHIBITS ON-DUTY AND ON-CALL REST PERIODS

On December 22, 2016, the California Supreme Court in AUGUSTUS v. ABM SECURITY SERVICES, INC., dealt another severe blow to employers in rest period cases: “What we conclude is that state law prohibits on-duty and on-call rest periods. During required rest periods, employers must relieve their employees of all duties…

Updated:

Employers with unsatisfied judgments: Don’t forget to comply with Labor Code §238 Bond Requirement

On October 11, 2015, the Governor signed into law SB 588, which added Labor Code §238 and went into effect January 1, 2016. If a final judgment against an employer arising from the employer’s nonpayment of wages remains unsatisfied for 90 days, an employer is prohibited from continuing to conduct…

Updated:

Vancouver Home LLC ordered to pay over $27,000 to a caregiver who worked less than 4 months

On November 4, 2016, a DLSE hearing officer awarded over $27,000.00 in overtime wage, liquidated damages, penalties and interest to a caregiver who worked 4 days per week for less than 4 months. At the outset, Vancouver Home LLC claimed that the employee was not even an employee.  Yeah right. …

Updated:

United States District Court for Northern District strikes down THE FINISH LINE, INC.’S arbitration agreement in Capili v. The Finish Line, Inc., 116 F.Supp.3d 1000 (2015)

I have seen some arbitration agreements that seem reasonable and then some that are outright abominable.  The Finish Line, Inc.’s arbitration agreement, that an employee submits to just by the fact of applying for or being employed by the company (you don’t need to sign to manifest consent), is on…

Updated:

TIRI v. LUCKY CHANCES, INC. (2014) 226 Cal. App. 4th 231: DELEGATION CLAUSE IN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT HELD NOT UNCONSCIONABLE

In a recent case before the First District Court of Appeal, Allan Villanueva briefed and argued the issue of whether a “Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims” was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable. On May 15, 2014, the Court held in Tiri v. Lucky Chances, Inc. “the trial court lacked the authority…

Contact Us